Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gail Pickens Barger's avatar

As a Geography Information Systems major back in the 80's one of the projects I worked on as an undergraduate was mapping the center pivot irrigation systems out in the panhandle of Oklahoma. We used at that time Landsat imagery to denote the differences in years apart data. We noted at least a doubling effect of the CPI's and I would hazard to say dipping into that particular water source.

Glad to find fellow geographers! Gail

Jewel Barlow's avatar

Hello Geoff, I am interested in the topics to which you refer in the video on the blessings of the United States. But I am not impressed by the somewhat hysterical presentation that is like the material routinely presented on TV sources that highlight the most negative aspects of the happenings every day. To make things better, it is almost always necessary to quantify the fundamental quantities that affect whatever is under consideration and consider quantitatively at least their rates of change and determine the means, if any, that can be brought bear that would change the trajectory of the systems under consideration. If it is feasible to make adjustments that will affect the trajectory, then a discussion of pros & cons might be productive. If you are going to provide information on geographical systems that contributes to such a discussion, I will stay with you. If not, then I will be departing. An example of quantification that I do not consider helpful is to say that the Ogallala Aquifer provides 1/5 of the ground water used in the United States when there are current efforts to increase efficiency by monitoring fields with resolution sufficient to provide very local distribution as needed by individual plants as compared to massive overwatering at times up to now.

No posts

Ready for more?